Scorpion OCP VS MultiCam®

Addressing a Common Misconception
From time to time, users in online forums claim that Scorpion OCP was created by Condor Outdoor as a way to avoid licensing MultiCam® from Crye Precision. This claim is incorrect.
Scorpion camouflage patterns originated during a U.S. Army camouflage research program in the early 2000s. The Army later refined that concept into Scorpion W2, which ultimately became the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) adopted by the U.S. Army beginning in 2015.
The decision to adopt OCP was made by the U.S. Department of Defense after extensive testing and evaluation, not by any gear manufacturer. Companies like ours simply produce equipment that supports the camouflage patterns used by military personnel and professionals.
While MultiCam® and OCP share visual similarities, they are separate camouflage patterns with different development histories and design goals. Understanding how these patterns evolved helps clarify why both remain widely used across military, law enforcement, and professional tactical communities today.
Why Camouflage Matters
Camouflage plays an important role in operational effectiveness. The purpose of a camouflage pattern is to break up the human silhouette and reduce visual detection across different terrain and lighting conditions.
Military personnel, law enforcement teams, and field professionals rely on camouflage to move through environments with reduced visibility. Effective camouflage helps users blend into natural surroundings, whether operating in woodland, arid terrain, or transitional environments.
Modern camouflage patterns are developed through extensive environmental testing to improve concealment while maintaining practical use in real-world conditions.
Scorpion OCP VS MultiCam®: Background
MultiCam® was developed by Crye Precision in the early 2000s as a multi environment camouflage pattern. Its design uses gradual color transitions and organic shapes that allow it to perform across a wide range of terrain types.
During operations in Afghanistan, the U.S. Army temporarily adopted MultiCam® for combat uniforms because it performed significantly better than the Universal Camouflage Pattern previously in use.
The Army later introduced the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) based on the Scorpion W2 design. Beginning in 2015, OCP became the official camouflage pattern used by the U.S. Army and later by the Air Force and Space Force.
Although the two patterns appear similar at first glance, they were developed independently and serve slightly different roles within military use.
Key Differences Between MultiCam and Scorpion OCP
| Feature | MultiCam® | OCP (Operational Camouflage Pattern) |
|---|---|---|
|
Image
|
|
|
|
Developer
|
Crye Precision
|
U.S. Army based on Scorpion W2
|
|
Introduction
|
Early 2000s
|
Introduced 2010, adopted Army-wide in 2015
|
|
Military Use
|
Used by special operations and units worldwide
|
Standard issue for the U.S. Army, Air Force, and Space Force
|
|
Pattern Style
|
Smooth gradient transitions with organic shapes
|
More defined shapes with slightly lighter tones
|
|
Terrain Performance
|
Designed for multi-terrain adaptability
|
Optimized for woodland and transitional terrain
|
|
Civilian Availability
|
Widely available
|
Available commercially but sometimes limited
|
Military and Professional Use
MultiCam® Usage
MultiCam® is known for its versatility. Its color palette blends greens, tans, and browns in a way that allows it to perform effectively across many environments.
Because of this adaptability, MultiCam® has been widely used by special operations units, law enforcement teams, and professionals who operate in varied terrain. It remains one of the most recognizable camouflage patterns used in tactical equipment today.
OCP Usage
Operational Camouflage Pattern is the current standard camouflage used by the U.S. Army. It was developed to provide reliable concealment while maintaining consistency across the force.
OCP performs well in environments commonly encountered by U.S. forces, including woodland, transitional terrain, and arid regions. As the official military pattern, it is widely used for uniforms and compatible tactical equipment.
Choosing Between MultiCam® and Scorpion OCP
The best camouflage pattern depends on the environment, mission requirements, and whether uniform regulations apply.
MultiCam® is often chosen when versatility across different terrain is important. It remains widely available across commercial tactical equipment and is frequently used by professionals who operate in multiple environments.
OCP is typically used when uniform compatibility and regulation compliance are required. Because it is the standard camouflage pattern for several U.S. military branches, it is commonly used for equipment intended to match issued uniforms.
Both patterns provide effective concealment when used in appropriate terrain.
Scorpion, OCP, and MultiCam®: Why the Confusion Exists
The confusion between these patterns largely comes from their shared history within U.S. camouflage development programs.
During the early 2000s, the Army evaluated several camouflage concepts as part of broader modernization efforts. One of those concepts was the original Scorpion pattern, developed during early research into multi-environment camouflage.
Years later, the Army revisited and refined that design into Scorpion W2, which ultimately became the basis for the Operational Camouflage Pattern adopted in 2015.
Because both MultiCam® and OCP evolved from the same era of camouflage research and use similar color palettes, they can appear very similar at a distance, even though the patterns themselves are constructed differently.
Why MultiCam® and OCP Look Similar
At first glance, the two camouflage patterns appear almost identical. The similarity comes from the shared goal of creating camouflage that performs across multiple environments.
MultiCam® uses soft gradient transitions and organic shapes to blend colors together across terrain types. This allows it to adapt well in environments that shift between desert, vegetation, and rocky terrain.
OCP uses a slightly lighter palette with more defined pattern elements. While still versatile, its design reflects the Army’s effort to create a standardized camouflage pattern that performs consistently across common operational environments.
These differences are subtle and often difficult to see unless the patterns are compared directly.
Where You’ll See Each Pattern Today
Both camouflage patterns remain widely used across military, law enforcement, and professional tactical communities.
MultiCam® continues to appear in equipment used by special operations units, law enforcement teams, and professionals operating in unpredictable terrain. Its adaptability across environments keeps it popular for gear and load-bearing equipment.
OCP serves as the official camouflage pattern used by the U.S. Army, Air Force, and Space Force. Because it is the standardized uniform pattern, many pieces of field equipment and compatible gear are produced in OCP to match issued uniforms.
In practice, the pattern someone uses often depends less on preference and more on uniform requirements, mission environment, and equipment compatibility.
Understanding the Role of Camouflage Today
Modern camouflage patterns are designed to perform across a wide range of terrain and lighting conditions. Advances in camouflage research have shifted away from single environment designs toward patterns that work in transitional landscapes.
Both MultiCam and OCP reflect this evolution. They represent a generation of camouflage patterns built to support real-world environments where terrain, vegetation, and lighting conditions constantly change.
For military personnel, law enforcement professionals, and field users, effective camouflage ultimately comes down to matching the right pattern to the terrain and using equipment that performs reliably in the field.











